Author Archives: oborn

Glimpsing the Tao … But not able to Grasp it

In the 2nd video of Session Two I summarized the ethical teachings of major world religions of today.  What I found striking when I first studied them was their degree of congruence.  Every teaching upholds honesty, truthfulness, self-control, chastity as more »

Posted in 2. Glimpsing the Nature of God - Considering Human Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

An Oscar Nominee hints at Objective Truth

A couple of weeks ago I was staying with some Iranian friends.  After supper we watched an Iranian film, A Separation, which is being nominated for two 2012 Academy Awards – Best Foreign Language Film and Best Original Screenplay.  It more »

Posted in 2. Glimpsing the Nature of God - Considering Human Ethics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

From Soapberry Bugs to SuperBugs: Nature’s slippery slide down & Naturalism’s slipperiness all around.

In the second video of Session 1 I documented immense confusion in attempts to try to identify a natural process which can be observed to increase the information and/or functional content in biological organisms.  And given the confident (but mistaken) more »

Posted in 1. Basis for God - Considering Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Origins: Evolution or Design – why touch it?

This site is about the gospel.  Yet Session 1 and several of my posts deal with origins, dissecting university textbooks and other books on evolution.  Why bothering getting into this confusing and sometimes touchy subject? It is a good question more »

Posted in 1. Basis for God - Considering Design, 2. Glimpsing the Nature of God - Considering Human Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Antony Flew Considered Design

When I was a university student, Antony Flew was considered to be one of the outstanding philosophers alive at the time.  He was also a prominent – world famous even – atheist.  In fact one of his contributions in the more »

Posted in 1. Basis for God - Considering Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Ubiquity of the Design Inference

I have noticed that it is often the very things that surround us all the time that escape our notice.  Or at least we seem to easily miss the significance of that which is everywhere – the ubiquitous.   It is more »

Posted in 1. Basis for God - Considering Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

First FAQ: Constantine’s impact on the Gospel is up

Did Constantine corrupt or manipulate the Gospel?  What was his role in the development of the Bible?  This FAQ is now uploaded here.

Posted in 3. Assessing 'The Book' - Considering the Textual Reliability of the Bible, 4. Considering the Historical Reliability of the Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Conversing on External Evidence (Part 2): substantiating the allusions of Abraham & Moses

In my previous post I noted that a really good comment had been submitted on the External Evidence Session, basically questioning the value of external evidence.  The comment noted that external evidence does not tell us whether or not the more »

Posted in 4. Considering the Historical Reliability of the Bible, 5. Considering Inspiration - How Allusions in the Bible point to a Divine Author | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Conversing on External Evidence (Part 1): From Flying Spaghetti Monsters to Mormonism and Krishna

Justin, your comments on External Evidence were so insightful I thought conversation should continue around them in a blog post.  You summarized my intent behind this session quite well by surmising I guess your main aim was to convince us more »

Posted in 4. Considering the Historical Reliability of the Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Closing of 2011: Your Common-Sense, Practical Test for the Reliability of the Bible

We are now in the closing hours of 2011.  One of the aspects of life today (and I am sure it will be true in 2012 as well) is that we rely so much on experts to address the various more »

Posted in 3. Assessing 'The Book' - Considering the Textual Reliability of the Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment